4.4 Article

NMDAR2B tyrosine phosphorylation regulates anxiety-like behavior and CRF expression in the amygdala

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-3-37

关键词

-

资金

  1. Global COE Program (Integrative Life Science Based on the Study of Biosignaling Mechanisms)
  2. Global COE Program (Comprehensive Center of Education and Research for Chemical Biology of the Diseases)
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH091429] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Anxiety disorders are a highly prevalent and disabling class of psychiatric disorders. There is growing evidence implicating the glutamate system in the pathophysiology and treatment of anxiety disorders, though the molecular mechanism by which the glutamate system regulates anxiety-like behavior remains unclear. Results: In this study, we provide evidence suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor, an ionotropic glutamate receptor, contributes to anxiety-like behavior. The GluN2B subunit of the NMDA receptor is tyrosine-phosphorylated: Tyr-1472 is the major phosphorylation site. Homozygous knock-in mice that express a Tyr-1472-Phe mutant of GluN2B, which prevents phosphorylation of this site, show enhanced anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze test. Expression of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), which is important for the regulation of anxiety-like behavior, is increased in the amygdala of the knock-in mice. Furthermore, injection of CRF receptor antagonist attenuated the enhanced anxiety-like behavior of the knock-in mice. We also show that elevated plus-maze exposure simultaneously induced de-phosphorylation of Tyr-1472 and increased CRF expression. Conclusions: These data suggest that Tyr-1472 phosphorylation on GluN2B is important for anxiety-like behavior by negative regulation of CRF expression in the amygdala.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据