4.6 Article

The effects of phosphite on strawberry yield and fruit quality

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 612-620

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-95162013005000049

关键词

Fragaria x ananassa Duch; anthocyanins; electrical conductivity of fruit; pH of fruit; fruit size

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) from Mexico for awarding EEO a Master of Science fellowship
  2. Priority Research Line 5 (LPI5) from Colegio de Postgraduados for research facilities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphite (H2PO3-; Phi) has been shown to increase fruit quality and activate plant defense mechanisms in plants when provided in a nutrient state with sufficient phosphorous. In this study, five solutions containing different percentages of Phi (0, 20, 30, 40 and 50%) in Steiner's solution were evaluated during the flowering and fructification stages; the Steiner' s nutrient solution was kept al 50% during the flowering stage and at 75% from the beginning of the fructification stage on. The objective was to determine the effects of phosphite on total P concentration in leaves, yield, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), anthocyanin concentration, and fruit size of strawberries (cv. Festival). The experiments were performed in a tunnel-type greenhouse using drip irrigation and volcanic rock (volcanic gravel) as substrate. In the fruit development phase, the concentration of P in the leaves was proportional to the level of Phi used. Although no significant differences were observed when compared to the control, the addition of 20% Phi slightly improved yield and fruit size. The highest pH, EC and anthocyanin concentration were identified in the fruit of plants treated with 30% Phi. Our findings suggest that supplying Phi at 30% or less in the nutrient solution does not significantly affect yield but does affect fruit quality and activates plant defense mechanisms by producing a higher concentration of anthocyanins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据