4.6 Article

Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

期刊

LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 43-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70213-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alberta Diabetes Institute
  2. Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes Strategic Training Program in Diabetic Research
  3. Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship
  4. Canadian Diabetes Association Doctoral Studentship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Sulfonylureas are common second-line options for management of type 2 diabetes; however, they are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared with other antidiabetic drugs. Since tissue selectivity and risk of hypoglycaemia differ among sulfonylureas, we aimed to assess whether mortality and the risk of cardiovascular events also varies. Methods We searched Medline and Embase from inception to June 11, 2014, to identify controlled studies reporting the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related mortality, or myocardial infarction for at least two sulfonylureas. We examined differences in cardiovascular event risk among sulfonylureas with random effects models for direct pairwise comparisons and network meta-analyses to incorporate direct and indirect data. Findings 14 970 (9%) of 167 327 patients in 18 studies died: 841 (4%) of 19 334 gliclazide users, 5482 (11%) of 49 389 glimepiride users, 2106 (15%) of 14 464 glipizide users, 5296 (7%) of 77 169 glibenclamide users, 1066 (17%) of 6187 tolbutamide users, and 179 (23%) of 784 chlorpropamide users. Inconsistency was low for the network meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, and the relative risk of death compared with glibenclamide was 0.65 (95% credible interval 0.53-0.79) for gliclazide, 0.83 (0.68-1.00) for glimepiride, 0.98 (0.80-1.19) for glipizide, 1.13 (0.90-1.42) for tolbutamide, and 1.34 (0.98-1.86) for chlorpropamide. Similar associations were noted for cardiovascular-related mortality: the relative risk compared with glibenclamide was 0.60 (95% credible interval 0.45-0.84) for gliclazide, 0.79 (0.57-1.11) for glimepiride, 1.01 (0.72-1.43) for glipizide, 1.11 (0.79-1.55) for tolbutamide, and 1.45 (0.88-2.44) for chlorpropamide. Interpretation Gliclazide and glimepiride were associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality compared with glibenclamide. Clinicians should consider possible differences in risk of mortality when selecting a sulfonylurea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据