4.6 Article

Spatial-temporal evolution of vegetation evapotranspiration in Hebei Province, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 2107-2117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61900-2

关键词

evapotranspiration; Hebei Province; MODIS; spatial pattern; vegetation; spatial-temporal evolution

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1502404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601562, 41761014]
  3. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Team Construction and Talent Development Project [JZ0145B752017]
  4. Research Project for Young Teachers of Fujian Province, China [JAT160085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evapotranspiration (ET) is the sum of soil or water body evaporation and plant transpiration from the earth surface and ocean to the atmosphere, and thus plays a significant role in regulating carbon and water resource cycles. The time-series data set from the remote sensing MOIDS product (MOD16) was used to study the spatial-temporal evolution of vegetation evapotranspiration in salinized areas during 2000-2014 by analyzing the variability, spatial patterns and Mann-Kendall (MK) nonparametric trends for the time series. The results indicate that inter-annual and intra-annual variations of ET across various vegetated areas show seasonal changes, with the abnormal months identified. The cultivated land displays a greater degree of spatial heterogeneity and the spatial pattern of ET in the area covered by broadleaved deciduous forests corresponds to a higher ET rate and increased water consumption. Awidespread decline of ET is observed only in cultivated areas. However, agricultural cultivation doesn't worsen water shortage and soil salinization problems in the region, and water shortage problems are worsening for other vegetated areas. This research provides a basis of reference for the reasonable allocation of water resources and restructuring of vegetation patterns in salinized areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据