4.5 Article

Association analysis of PTPN22, CTLA4 and IFIH1 genes with type 1 diabetes in Colombian families

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 402-410

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12192

关键词

association study; Colombia; IFIH1; PTPN22; type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. Colciencias [111540820532]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundProtein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 22 (lymphoid) (PTPN22), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), and interferon induced with helicase C domain 1 (IFIH1) are among the confirmed type 1 diabetes (T1D) susceptibility genes in several populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of PTPN22, CTLA4, and IFIH1 gene variants in the development of T1D in a Colombian population. MethodsAssociations of PTPN22, CTLA4, and IFIH1 variants with T1D were investigated in a sample of 197 nuclear families, including 205 affected children, in the Colombian population. Three to four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed per gene: rs2476600, rs2476601, rs1217418, and rs2488457 for PTPN22; rs1990760, rs3747517, and rs10930046 for IFIH1; and rs231775, rs3087243, and rs231779 for CTLA4. A transmission disequilibrium test was performed for the global sample, in addition to stratified analysis considering autoimmunity, age at onset, and parent of origin. Haplotypes per gene were also analyzed. ResultsThere was no significant transmission distortion for CTLA4. Conversely, SNPsrs10930046 (IFIH1) and rs2476601 (PTPN222) exhibited significant transmission distortion of the C and T alleles, respectively, from parents to affected children (odds ratio [OR] 0.57 and 1.83, respectively). In addition, decreased transmission of the C allele for rs10930046 occurred preferentially from mothers. Stratification analysis revealed that this association was maintained in individuals who were positive for autoantibodies and in those with an age of diagnosis <5 years. ConclusionThe results show that IFIH1 and PTPN22 are associated with T1D in Colombian families.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据