4.3 Article

A 3-year follow-up of ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (Ce-TZP/A) frameworks for fixed dental prostheses

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 55-61

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.11.006

关键词

Fixed dental prostheses; Ceria-stabilized; Zirconia; Framework; Clinical evaluation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Zirconia/alumina nanocomposite stabilized with cerium oxide (Ce-TZP/A) shows significantly higher mechanical strength than yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP) and allows post-sintered machining that does not require any subsequent treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical performance of veneered Ce-TZP/A frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. Methods: Fifteen patients with 22 Ce-TZP/A fixed prostheses were included in this study. The fixed dental prostheses were cemented with resin cement (baseline) and were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after cementation. Clinical events, including fracture and loss of retention, secondary caries, and marginal integrity, were recorded. The biologic outcome was judged by comparing the pre-treatment and post-treatment bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing pocket depth (PPD) of the abutment teeth. Radiographic examination was also performed at 12, 24 and 36 months. Results: The mean observation period was 35.9 +/- 5.5 months. During this period, one abutment tooth was extracted due to root fracture and the survival rate was 95.2%. No significant change in BOP, PPD, and radiographic image was found during the 36-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Ce-TZP/A was found to provide sufficient stability as a framework material in all regions. Special attention, however, must be paid to designing framework that provides sufficient support for the veneer. Furthermore, studies with longer observation periods and more patients are needed. (C) 2014 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据