4.0 Article

Do patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing cardiac surgery have acceptable outcomes?

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.241190

关键词

Cirrhosis; Liver dysfunction; Heart surgery; Outcome; Evidence-based medicine; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients with liver cirrhosis have acceptable outcomes after undergoing cardiac surgery. Altogether 97 papers were found using the reported search, of which nine presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, year, journal, country of study, study type, patient group studied, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. One prospective and another eight retrospective studies involving adult population of patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing various cardiac surgical procedures were selected. In these studies, the overall mortality was 17.1% and combined mean mortality for Child-Pugh class A, B and C was 5.2%, 35.4% and 70%, respectively. The major morbidity ranged from 20 to 60% in group A and 50 to 100% in the patients with more advanced hepatic disease. Some studies have demonstrated that thrombocytopenia, decreased serum cholinesterase and high preoperative total bilirubin levels are significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes. These studies, although with small samples, collectively demonstrate that patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis tolerated cardiac surgical procedures with a mild increase in mortality and morbidity. However, the risk of mortality in patients with Child-Pugh class B and C or MELD score >13 is extremely high. Nevertheless, even if these patients underwent successful surgery, their long-term survival was significantly poorer and their health status remains compromised even well after cardiac surgery because of persistent liver dysfunction. (C) 2010 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据