4.4 Article

Efficacy and safety of growth hormone treatment in children with short stature: the Italian cohort of the GeNeSIS clinical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 667-677

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-015-0418-0

关键词

Pediatric GH treatment; Short stature; Growth; Safety; Final height

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose We examined auxological changes in growth hormone (GH)-treated children in Italy using data from the Italian cohort of the multinational observational Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study (GeNeSIS) of pediatric patients requiring GH treatment. Methods We studied 711 children (median baseline age 9.6 years). Diagnosis associated with short stature was as determined by the investigator. Height standard deviation score (SDS) was evaluated yearly until final or near-final height (n = 78). Adverse events were assessed in all GH-treated patients. Results The diagnosis resulting in GH treatment was GH deficiency (GHD) in 85.5 % of patients, followed by Turner syndrome (TS 6.6 %). Median starting GH dose was higher in patients with TS (0.30 mg/kg/week) than patients with GHD (0.23 mg/kg/week). Median (interquartile range) GH treatment duration was 2.6 (0.6-3.7) years. Mean (95 % confidence interval) final height SDS gain was 2.00 (1.27-2.73) for patients with organic GHD (n = 18) and 1.19 (0.97-1.40) for patients with idiopathic GHD (n = 41), but lower for patients with TS, 0.37 (-0.03 to 0.77, n = 13). Final height SDS was >-2 for 94 % of organic GHD, 88 % of idiopathic GHD and 62 % of TS patients. Mean age at GH start was lower for organic GHD patients, and treatment duration was longer than for other groups, resulting in greater mean final height gain. GH-related adverse events occurred mainly in patients diagnosed with idiopathic GHD. Conclusions Data from the Italian cohort of GeNeSIS showed auxological changes and safety of GH therapy consistent with results from international surveillance databases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据