4.2 Review

Neglected tropical disease control in post-war Sierra Leone using the Onchocerciasis Control Programme as a platform

期刊

INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 69-74

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.inhe.2011.03.003

关键词

Neglected tropical diseases; Onchocerciasis; Lymphatic filariasis; Schistosomiasis; Soil-transmitted helminths; Trachoma

资金

  1. African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), Sightsavers International
  2. Mectizan Donation Programme
  3. World Bank

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strategic investments in the control of neglected tropical diseases (NTD) spearheaded by the US Government, the British Government and other bilateral donors such as foundations and key pharmaceutical partners have enabled the treatment of millions of people for the five targeted debilitating diseases (lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis and trachoma), paving the way for the potential elimination as public health problems of some of these diseases. Like many other countries, Sierra Leone has a high burden of these major NTDs. Despite the fragile infrastructure of a health system emerging from a devastating 10-year civil war, the country has successfully implemented the National NTD Control Programme, reaching national coverage in 2010. The NTD Control Programme uses the existing Onchocerciasis Control Programme as a platform and involves primary health workers. The programme has provided extensive training opportunities to health workers at national, district and community levels. The country currently has 31 161 trained community volunteers treating a population of five million people. It is shown that the investments in NTD control are not only to control NTDs but also to strengthen health systems, particularly at the primary level, through extensive capacity building of frontline health workers and community-directed distributors. (C) 2011 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据