4.4 Article

Sinonasal anatomic variants and asthma are associated with faster development of chronic rhinosinusitis in patients with allergic rhinitis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21163

关键词

allergic rhinitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; computed tomography; infraorbital cell; Haller cell; frontal intersinus cell; asthma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are a major burden to the healthcare system. Although no causal relationship has been established, previous work has demonstrated a strong association of AR with CRS. In this study, we sought to identify risk factors that may influence speed of development of CRS in patients with AR. MethodsRetrospective review of all patients diagnosed with AR without CRS presenting to an otolaryngology clinic at a tertiary medical center as part of a multidisciplinary allergy evaluation between March 2004 and November 2011. Medical records were evaluated for clinicodemographic factors including age, gender, smoking history, medical comorbidities, categories of AR based on formal allergy testing, the presence of sinonasal anatomic variants on computed tomography as well as subsequent development of CRS. ResultsFaster progression to CRS in patients with AR was associated with comorbid asthma (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.97) as well as sinonasal anatomic variants, such as infraorbital cells (HR = 7.39), and frontal intersinus cells (HR = 68.03), on multivariate survival analysis. A statistically significant but negative interaction between infraorbital cells and frontal intersinus cells suggests that concomitant presence of both leads to a less than additive increase in the rate of CRS progression. ConclusionSinonasal anatomical variants, infraorbital cells, and frontal intersinus cells, as well as comorbid asthma are associated with faster development of CRS in patients with AR. The presence of these clinical risk factors identifies patients who should be counseled on compliance with medical therapy for AR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据