4.4 Article

Periostin and osteopontin are overexpressed in chronically inflamed sinuses

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/alr.20031

关键词

chronic rhinosinusitis; extracellular matrix; matricellular proteins; osteopontin; periostin

资金

  1. American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), the inflammation leads to a proliferative response in the extracellular matrix (ECM). Periostin and osteopontin are 2 ECM proteins which have received attention for their roles in tissue remodeling in inflammatory diseases of the upper and lower airways. Transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF beta 1) is an inflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in fibrotic conditions affecting virtually every organ. In this study we seek to evaluate the differential expression of periostin, osteopontin, and TGF beta 1 in the ethmoid sinus and nasal floor of patients with CRS. Furthermore, we seek to determine if a correlation exists between their differential expression in the nose and sinuses of patients with CRS. Methods: Biopsies from ethmoid sinus and nasal floor mucosa were taken from 15 patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for CRS. Complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray analysis demonstrated upregulation of periostin and osteopontin in the ethmoid sinus samples. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed for periostin, osteopontin, and TGF beta 1. Statistical analysis was undertaken to examine correlations between the 3 genes of interest. Results: RT-PCR confirmed that periostin and osteopontin were overexpressed in the ethmoid samples compared to the nasal floor. The differential expression of both periostin and osteopontin showed significant correlation with TGF beta 1. Conclusion: Periostin and osteopontin appear to be involved in ECM remodeling seen in CRS. TGF beta 1 may be an upstream inducer of CRS-related changes in ethmoid sinus mucosa. (C) 2011 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据