4.4 Article

Browning-related oxygen depletion in an oligotrophic lake

期刊

INLAND WATERS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 255-263

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20442041.2018.1452355

关键词

anoxia; browning; dissolved organic carbon; dissolved oxygen; lakes

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-1318747, DEB-1754265, DEB-1754276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent decades, terrestrial dissolved organic matter (DOM) has increased in many northeastern North American and European lakes and is contributing to long-term browning. We used a long-term dataset (1988-2014) to study the consequences of browning-related decreased water transparency on dissolved oxygen dynamics in 2 small temperate lakes in Pennsylvania, USA, that differ in their dissolved organic carbon concentrations. The oligotrophic (clearer) lake has low productivity and historically oxygenated deep waters. The mesotrophic-slightly dystrophic (browner) lake also has relatively low productivity but historically anoxic deep waters. We examined whether browning coincided with changes in summer dissolved oxygen dynamics, with a focus on deep-water oxygen depletion. In the clearer lake, we found that minimum oxygen concentrations decreased by similar to 4.4 mg L-1 over the 27-year period, and these changes were strongly associated with both decreased water transparency and increased water column stability. We also found a shallowing of the maximum dissolved oxygen depth by similar to 4.5 m and anoxic conditions established in more recent years. In the browner lake, the metrics we used did not detect any significant changes in dissolved oxygen, supporting the prediction that vertical temperature and oxygen patterns in clearer lakes may be more sensitive to increasing DOM than darker lakes. Anoxia is traditionally considered to be a consequence of anthropogenic nutrient loading and, more recently, a warming climate. We show that browning is another type of environmental change that may similarly result in anoxia in oligotrophic lakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据