4.5 Article

Coverage and predictors of vaccination against 2012/13 seasonal influenza in Madrid, Spain Analysis of population-based computerized immunization registries and clinical records

期刊

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 449-455

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/hv.27152

关键词

coverage; influenza; predictors; registries; vaccine

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias-Health Research Fund [PI12/02477]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aim to determine 2012-13 seasonal influenza vaccination coverage. Data were analyzed by age group and by coexistence of concomitant chronic conditions. Factors associated with vaccine uptake were identified. We also analyze a possible trend in vaccine uptake in post pandemic seasons. We used computerized immunization registries and clinical records of the entire population of the Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain (6 284 128 persons) as data source. A total of 871 631 individuals were vaccinated (13.87%). Coverage for people aged >= 65 years was 56.57%. Global coverage in people with a chronic condition was 15.7% in children and 18.69% in adults aged 15-59 years. The variables significantly associated with a higher likelihood of being vaccinated in the 2012-13 campaign for the age groups studied were higher age, being Spanish-born, higher number of doses of seasonal vaccine received in previous campaigns, uptake of pandemic vaccination, and having a chronic condition. We conclude that vaccination coverage in persons aged <60 years with chronic conditions is less than acceptable. The very low coverage among children with chronic conditions calls for urgent interventions. Among those aged >= 60 years, uptake is higher but still far from optimal and seems to be descending in post-pandemic campaigns. For those aged >= 65 years the mean percentage of decrease from the 2009/10 to the actual campaign has been 12%. Computerized clinical and immunization registers are useful tools for providing rapid and detailed information about influenza vaccination coverage in the population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据