4.5 Article

Current evidence on intradermal influenza vaccines administered by Soluvia (TM) licensed micro injection system

期刊

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 67-75

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/hv.8.1.18419

关键词

intradermal; influenza vaccine; micro injection system; safety; tolerability; acceptability; immunogenicity

资金

  1. GSK
  2. Pfizer
  3. Sanofi Pasteur
  4. Crucell Berna
  5. Novartis Vaccines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the several strategies explored for (1) the enhancement of the immune response to influenza immunization, (2) the improvement of the vaccine acceptability and (3) the overcoming of the egg-dependency for vaccine production, intradermal administration of influenza vaccine emerges as a promising alternative to conventional intramuscular route, thanks to the recent availability of new delivery devices and the perception of advantages in terms of immunogenicity, safety, reduction of antigen content and acceptability. Data from clinical trials performed in children, adults, <60 y and elderly people and post-marketing surveillance demonstrate that actually, licensed intradermal influenza vaccines, Intanza (TM) 9 and 15 mu g and Fluzone (TM) Intradermal, administered by the microinjection system Soluvia (TM), show an excellent acceptability, tolerability and safety profile. Formulations containing 9 and 15 mu g per strain demonstrate, respectively, comparable and superior immunogenicity than conventional intramuscular vaccines. Licensed intradermal influenza vaccines can be considered a valid alternative to standard intramuscular vaccination offering significant advantages in low-responder populations and helping to increase influenza vaccination coverage rates especially in people with fear of needles or high apprehension associated with annual vaccination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据