4.2 Review

A Reproductive Subtype of Depression: Conceptualizing Models and Moving Toward Etiology

期刊

HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 72-86

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1080/10673220902899706

关键词

estrogen; major depression; neurosteroids; perimenopause; postpartum; premenstrual; reproductive; serotonin

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K23MH074799] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [K23 MH074799-01A2, K23 MH074799] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lifetime risk for major depression in women is well known to be twice the risk in men and is especially high during the reproductive years between menarche and menopause. A subset of reproductive-age women experience depressive episodes that are triggered by hormonal fluctuations. Such reproductive depressions involve episodes of depression that occur specifically during the premenstrual, postpartum, and perimenopausal phases in women. These reproductive subtypes of depression can be conceptualized as a specific biological response to the effects of hormonal fluctuations in the brain. The different types of reproductive depressions are associated with each other, have unique risk factors that are distinct from nonreproductive depression episodes, and respond to both hormonal and nonhormonal interventions. This review uses a PubMed search of relevant literature to discuss clinical, animal, and genetic evidence for reproductive depression as a specific subtype of major depression. Unique treatment options, such as hormonal interventions, are also discussed, and hypotheses regarding the underlying biology of reproductive depressionincluding interactions between the serotonergic system and estrogen, as well as specific effects on neurosteroidsare explored. This review will provide evidence supporting reproductive depression as a distinct clinical entity with specific treatment approaches and a unique biology that is separate from nonreproductive depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据