4.5 Article

Brain regions associated with the acquisition of conditioned place preference for cocaine vs. social interaction

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00063

关键词

conditioned place preference; drug abuse; social interaction; cocaine; reward; Zif268 expression; reinstatement; acquisition

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M1169-B18, P23824-B18, W1206-B18]
  2. Verein fur Experimentelle Psychiatrie, psychotherapic, und Pharmakologie (VEPPP)
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 23824] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1206, P23824] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Positive social interaction could play an essential role in switching the preference of the substance dependent individual away from drug related activities. We have previously shown that conditioned place preference (CPP) for cocaine at the dose of 15 mg/kg and CPP for four 15-min episodes of social interaction were equally strong when rats were concurrently conditioned for place preference by pairing cocaine with one compartment and social interaction with the other. The aim of the present study was to investigate the differential activation of brain regions related to the reward circuitry after acquistion/expression of cocaine CPP or social interaction CPP. Our findings indicate that cocaine CPP and social interaction CPP activated almost the same brain regions. However, the granular insular cortex and the dorsal part of the granular insular cortex were more activated after cocaine CPP, whereas the prelimbic cortex and the core subregion of the nucleus accumbens were more activated after social interaction CPP. These results suggest that the insular cortex appears to be potently activated after drug conditioning leraning while activation of the prelimbic cortex-nucleus accumbens core projection seems to be preferentially involved in the conditioning to non-drug stimuli such as social interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据