4.6 Article

Peripheral arterial disease, prevalence and cumulative risk factor profile analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 704-711

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1177/2047487312452968

关键词

Peripheral arterial disease; risk assessment; traditional cardiovascular risk factors; NHANES

资金

  1. NHLBI-K12 Research Career Development Award [REA-HE-05-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The primary aim of the present study was to determine the cumulative effect of a set of peripheral artery disease (PAD) risk factors among age, gender and race/ethnicity groups in the United States. Methods: We examined data from a nationally representative sample of the US population (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], 1999-2004). A total of 7058 subjects 40 years or older that completed the interview, medical examination and had ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were included in this study. Results: The age-and sex-standardized prevalence of PAD was 4.6 % (standard error [SE] 0.3%). The highest prevalence of PAD was observed among elderly, non-Hispanic Blacks and women. In a multivariable age-, gender-and race/ethnicity-adjusted model hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and smoking were retained as PAD risk factors (p <= 0.05 for each). The odds of PAD increased with each additional risk factor present from a non-significant 1.5-fold increase (O.R 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.6) in the presence of one risk factor, to more than ten-fold (OR 10.2, 95% CI 6.4-16.3) in the presence of three or more risk factors. In stratified analysis, non-Hispanic Blacks (OR 14.7, 95% CI 2.1-104.1) and women (OR 18.6, 95% CI 7.1-48.7) were particularly sensitive to this cumulative effect. Conclusion: In a large nationally representative sample, an aggregate set of risk factors that included diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and smoking significantly increase the likelihood of prevalent PAD. A cumulative risk factor analysis highlights important susceptibility differences among different population groups and provides additional evidence to redefine screening strategies in PAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据