4.5 Review

Clinical implication of mitral annular plane systolic excursion for patients with cardiovascular disease

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes240

关键词

Mitral annular plane systolic excursion; Clinical implication

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [BMBF01 EO1004]
  2. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) has been suggested as a parameter for left ventricular (LV) function. This review describes the current clinical application and potential implications of routinely using MAPSE in patients with various cardiovascular diseases. Reduced MAPSE reflects impaired longitudinal function and thus provides complementary information to ejection fraction (EF), which represents the global result of both longitudinal and circumferential contraction. Reduced long-axis deformation results from dysfunctional or stressed longitudinal myofibres due to endo- (and potentially epi-) cardial ischaemia, fibrosis, or increased wall stress. In patients with aortic stenosis, reduced MAPSE is suggestive of subendocardial fibrosis. Moreover, reduced MAPSE could be used as a sensitive early marker of LV systolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients with normal EF, where compensatory increased circumferential deformation might mask the reduced longitudinal deformation. In addition, reduced MAPSE was associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure, atrial fibrillation and post-myocardial infarction as well as in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Despite of the routine use of newer and more refined echocardiographic technologies nowadays, such as strain-rate imaging, speckle-tracking imaging, and 3D echocardiography, the use of MAPSE measurement is still especially helpful to evaluate LV systolic function in case of poor sonographic windows, since good imaging quality is required for most of the modern echocardiographic techniques with the exception of tissue Doppler imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据