4.5 Article

Clinical significance of global two-dimensional strain as a surrogate parameter of myocardial fibrosis and cardiac events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer318

关键词

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Global strain; Myocardial fibrosis; Cardiac events

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been reported to be associated with myocardial fibrosis and cardiac events. In patients with HCM, two-dimensional (2D) strain can identify subclinical global systolic dysfunction despite normal left ventricular (LV) chamber function. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that global 2D strain could detect subtle myocardial fibrosis and serve as a novel prognostic parameter in HCM patients. Methods and results Echocardiography and MRI were performed in 48 consecutive patients with HCM and normal chamber function. We measured global longitudinal strain (GLS) in apical two-chamber, four-chamber, and long-axis views using speckle-tracking analysis. The extent of LGE (%LGE = LGE volume/total LV volume) and LV mass index were calculated by MRI using Simpson's rule and custom software. All patients were followed up for major cardiac events. Global longitudinal strain in patients with LGE was significantly lower than that without LGE (-11.8 +/- 2.8 vs. -15.0 +/- 1.7%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that GLS was an independent predictor of %LGE (standard coefficient = 0.627, P < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 42 +/- 12 months, five patients had cardiac events. When the patients were stratified based on the median level of GLS (-12.9%), all events were observed in the worse GLS group (P = 0.018). Conclusion These results suggest that global 2D strain might provide useful information on myocardial fibrosis and cardiac events in HCM patients with normal chamber function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据