4.5 Review

Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 176-194

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.04.001

关键词

Cognitive training; Transcranial electrical stimulation; Neuroplasticity; Learning difficulties; Dyscalculia; Dyslexia; ADHD

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  3. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)
  4. Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Learning difficulties in atypical brain development represent serious obstacles to an individual's future achievements and can have broad societal consequences. Cognitive training can improve learning impairments only to a certain degree. Recent evidence from normal and clinical adult populations suggests that transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), a portable, painless, inexpensive, and relatively safe neuroenhancement tool, applied in conjunction with cognitive training can enhance cognitive intervention outcomes. This includes, for instance, numerical processing, language skills and response inhibition deficits commonly associated with profound learning difficulties and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The current review introduces the functional principles, current applications and promising results, and potential pitfalls of TES. Unfortunately, research in child populations is limited at present. We suggest that TES has considerable promise as a tool for increasing neuroplasticity in atypically developing children and may be an effective adjunct to cognitive training in clinical settings if it proves safe. The efficacy and both short- and long-term effects of TES on the developing brain need to be critically assessed before it can be recommended for clinical settings. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据