4.5 Article

How stable is activation in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex in adolescence? A study of emotional face processing across three measurements

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 65-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.09.005

关键词

Adolescence; Emotions; Faces; Limbic system; Longitudinal; Test-retest reliability

资金

  1. LUMC vrije beleidsruimte
  2. WOP (Rivierduinen)
  3. Hersenstichting
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [917 863 68]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior developmental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated elevated activation patterns in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex (PFC) in response to viewing emotional faces. As adolescence is a time of substantial variability in mood and emotional responsiveness, the stability of activation patterns could be fluctuating over time. In the current study, 27 healthy adolescents (age: 12-19 years) were scanned three times over a period of six months (mean test-retest interval of three months; final samples N=27, N=22, N=18). At each session, participants performed the same emotional faces task. At first measurement the presentation of emotional faces resulted in heightened activation in bilateral amygdala, bilateral lateral PFC and visual areas including the fusiform face area. Average activation did not differ across test-sessions overtime, indicating that at the group level activation patterns in this network do not vary significantly overtime. However, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), fMRI reliability demonstrated only fair reliability for PFC (ICC = 0.41-0.59) and poor reliability for the amygdala (ICC < 0.4). These findings suggest substantial variability of brain activity over time and may have implications for studies investigating the influence of treatment effects on changes in neural levels in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据