4.8 Article

MicroRNAs Establish Robustness and Adaptability of a Critical Gene Network to Regulate Progenitor Fate Decisions during Cortical Neurogenesis

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1779-1788

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.029

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche-ANR [ANR-09-MNPS-029]
  2. TransCTX [PO08978]
  3. Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris-ENP
  4. INSERM/CNRS ATIP-AVENIR programme
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale en France-FRM [SPF20090515606]
  6. DFG Collaborative Research Center [SFB655]
  7. Center for Regenerative Therapies and Medical Faculty of the TU Dresden
  8. ANR
  9. Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques
  10. DFG [AR 732/1-1]
  11. APHP (Contrat Hospitalier de Recherche Translationnelle)
  12. ARC [SF120121205530]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the course of cortical neurogenesis, the transition of progenitors from proliferation to differentiation requires a precise regulation of involved gene networks under varying environmental conditions. In order to identify such regulatory mechanisms, we analyzed microRNA (miRNA) target networks in progenitors during early and late stages of neurogenesis. We found that cyclin D1 is a network hub whose expression is miRNA-dosage sensitive. Experimental validation revealed a feedback regulation between cyclin D1 and its regulating miRNAs miR-20a, miR-20b, and miR-23a. Cyclin D1 induces expression of miR-20a and miR-20b, whereas it represses miR-23a. Inhibition of any of these miRNAs increases the developmental stage-specific mean and dynamic expression range (variance) of cyclin D1 protein in progenitors, leading to reduced neuronal differentiation. Thus, miRNAs establish robustness and stage-specific adaptability to a critical dosage-sensitive gene network during cortical neurogenesis. Understanding such network regulatory mechanisms for key developmental events can provide insights into individual susceptibilities for genetically complex neuropsychiatric disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据