4.8 Article

RIP3 Inhibits Inflammatory Hepatocarcinogenesis but Promotes Cholestasis by Controlling Caspase-8-and JNK-Dependent Compensatory Cell Proliferation

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 776-790

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.035

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) [110043]
  2. ERC [ERC-2007-Stg/208237-Luedde-Med3-Aachen]
  3. German Research Foundation [SFB-TRR57/P06, SFB-TR36]
  4. EMBO Young Investigator Program
  5. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research BIOMAT Aachen
  6. Ernst Jung Foundation Hamburg
  7. medical faculty of the RWTH Aachen
  8. Helmholtz Foundation
  9. Hofschneider Foundation
  10. Helmholtz Alliance Preclinical Comprehensive Center
  11. ERC Starting Grant (LiverCancerMechanisms)
  12. Deutsche Stiftung Herzforschung [12/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For years, the term apoptosis was used synonymously with programmed cell death. However, it was recently discovered that receptor interacting protein 3 (RIP3)-dependent necroptosis represents an alternative programmed cell death pathway activated in many inflamed tissues. Here, we show in a genetic model of chronic hepatic inflammation that activation of RIP3 limits immune responses and compensatory proliferation of liver parenchymal cells (LPC) by inhibiting Caspase-8-dependent activation of Jun-(N)-terminal kinase in LPC and non-parenchymal liver cells. In this way, RIP3 inhibits intrahepatic tumor growth and impedes the Caspase-8-dependent establishment of specific chromosomal aberrations that mediate resistance to tumor-necrosis-factor-induced apoptosis and underlie hepatocarcinogenesis. Moreover, RIP3 promotes the development of jaundice and cholestasis, because its activation suppresses compensatory proliferation of cholangiocytes and hepatic stem cells. These findings demonstrate a function of RIP3 in regulating carcinogenesis and cholestasis. Controlling RIP3 or Caspase-8 might represent a chemopreventive or therapeutic strategy against hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据