4.6 Article

Rapid Language Identification

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2015.2419978

关键词

I-vector; noise robustness; rapid language identification; short-duration speech; total variability modeling; universal background model (UBM) fusion

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [0911009] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A critical challenge to automatic language identification (LID) is achieving accurate performance with the shortest possible speech segment in a rapid fashion. The accuracy to correctly identify the spoken language is highly sensitive to the duration of speech and is bounded by the amount of information available. The proposed approach for rapid language identification transforms the utterances to a low dimensional i-vector representation upon which language classification methods are applied. In order to meet the challenges involved in rapidly making reliable decisions about the spoken language, a highly accurate and computationally efficient framework of i-vector extraction is proposed. The LID framework integrates the approach of universal background model (UBM) fused total variability modeling. UBM-fused modeling yields the estimation of a more discriminant, single i-vector space. This way, it is also a computationally more efficient alternative than system level fusion. A further reduction in equal error rate is achieved by training the i-vector model on long duration speech utterances and by the deployment of a robust feature extraction scheme that aims to capture the relevant language cues under various acoustic conditions. Evaluation results on the DARPA RATS data corpus suggest the potential of performing successful automated language identification at the level of one second of speech or even shorter duration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据