4.6 Article

Individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue: Influence of sex

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 278, 期 -, 页码 462-469

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.036

关键词

Sign-tracker; Goal-tracker; Sex differences; Conditioned reinforcement; Pavlovian conditioned approach

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [201311MFE-321581-165632]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [PO1 DA031656]
  3. National Institutes of Health [P50-DA-037844]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is considerable individual variation in the propensity of animals to attribute incentive salience to discrete reward cues, but to date most of this research has been conducted in male rats. The purpose of this study was to determine whether sex influences the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue, using rats from two different outbred strains (Sprague-Dawley [SD] and Heterogeneous Stock [HS]). The motivational value of a food cue was assessed in two ways: (i) by the ability of the cue to elicit approach toward it and (ii) by its ability to act as a conditioned reinforcer. We found that female SD rats acquired Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior slightly faster than males, but no sex difference was detected in HS rats, and neither strain showed a sex difference in asymptotic performance of approach behavior. Moreover, female approach behavior did not differ across estrous cycle. Compared to males, females made more active responses during the test for conditioned reinforcement, although they made more inactive responses as well. We conclude that although there are small sex differences in performance on these tasks, these are probably not due to a notable sex difference in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据