期刊
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00181
关键词
definition of synergy; drug combinations; Bliss and Loewe models; interaction barometer; consensus agreement
资金
- Academy of Finland [272437, 269862, 279163, 292611, 277293]
- Cancer Society of Finland
- Cancer Foundation Finland sr [140087] Funding Source: researchfish
- Academy of Finland (AKA) [277293, 272437, 277293, 279163, 292611, 279163, 292611] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
Many biological or chemical agents when combined interact with each other and produce a synergistic response that cannot be predicted based on the single agent responses alone. However, depending on the postulated null hypothesis of non-interaction, one may end up in different interpretations of synergy. Two popular reference models for null hypothesis include the Bliss independence model and the Loewe additivity model, each of which is formulated from different perspectives. During the last century, there has been an intensive debate on the suitability of these synergy models, both of which are theoretically justified and also in practice supported by different schools of scientists. More than 20 years ago, there was a community effort to make a consensus on the terminology one should use when claiming synergy. The agreement was formulated at a conference held in Saariselka, Finland in 1992, stating that one should use the terms Bliss synergy or Loewe synergy to avoid ambiguity in the underlying models. We review the theoretical relationships between these models and argue that one should combine the advantages of both models to provide a more consistent definition of synergy and antagonism.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据