4.6 Article

Validating childhood asthma in an epidemiological study using linked electronic patient records

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005345

关键词

Epidemiology; Primary Care

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT086118/Z/08/Z]
  2. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. University of Bristol for ALSPAC [WT092731]
  5. MRC [MR/K006665/1, MR/K006525/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K006525/1, MR/K006665/1, MC_PC_15018, MC_PC_13042, G9815508] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the performance of parent-reported data in identifying physician-confirmed asthma. Design and setting Validation study using linkage between the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and electronic patient records held within the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Participants Participants were those eligible to participate in ALSPAC who also had a record in the GPRD; this included 765 individuals, just under 4% of ALSPAC-eligible participants. The analysis was based on 141 participants with complete parent-reported asthma data. Primary and secondary outcome measures The main GPRD outcome measure was whether a child had a diagnosis of asthma before they were nine. Parent-reported measures were doctor diagnosis of asthma (before mean age 7.5years), various outcomes based on wheezing and breathlessness recorded longitudinally between 6months and 8.5years. Secondary outcomes were bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR), forced expiratory volume in 1s/forced vital capacity ratio and skin prick test responses. Results Among the 141 participants with complete parent-reported data, 26 (18%) had an asthma diagnosis before age nine. Using general practitioner (GP)-recorded asthma as the gold standard, the question Has a doctor ever diagnosed your child with asthma?' was both sensitive (88.5%) and specific (95.7%). Ever wheezed' had the highest sensitivity (100%) but low specificity (60%). More specific definitions were obtained by restricting to those who had wheezed on more than one occasion, experienced frequent wheeze and/or wheezed after the age of 3, but these measures had low sensitivities. BHR only identified 50% of those with a GP-recorded diagnosis. Conclusions Parental reports of a doctor's diagnosis agree well with a GP-recorded diagnosis. High specificity for asthma can be achieved by using detailed wheezing questions, although these definitions are likely to exclude mild cases of asthma. Our study shows that linkage between observational studies and electronic patient records has the potential to enhance epidemiological research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据