4.6 Article

Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005752

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research/Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network (CIHR/DSEN) [286941 DC0190GP]
  2. CIHR/DSEN New Investigator Awards in Knowledge Synthesis
  3. University of Ottawa Research Chair
  4. Roy and Vi Baay Chair in Kidney Research
  5. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
  6. Faculty of Pharmacy
  7. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  8. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
  9. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions
  10. Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Translation
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [F32DC000190] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and poor glycaemic control despite treatment with two oral agents. Setting: Studies were multicentre and multinational. Participants: Ten studies including 2967 patients with T2DM. Interventions: Studies that examined DPP-4 inhibitors compared with each other, intermediate-acting insulin, no treatment or placebo in patients with T2DM. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcome was glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary outcomes were healthcare utilisation, body weight, fractures, quality of life, microvascular complications, macrovascular complications, all-cause mortality, harms, cost and cost-effectiveness. Results: 10 randomised clinical trials with 2967 patients were included after screening 5831 titles and abstracts, and 180 full-text articles. DPP-4 inhibitors significantly reduced HbA1c versus placebo in network meta-analysis (NMA; mean difference (MD) -0.62%, 95% CI -0.93% to -0.33%) and meta-analysis (MD -0.61%, 95% CI -0.81% to -0.41%), respectively. Significant differences in HbA1c were not observed for neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin versus placebo and DPP-4 inhibitors versus NPH insulin in NMA. In meta-analysis, no significant differences were observed between DPP-4 inhibitors and placebo for severe hypoglycaemia, weight gain, cardiovascular disease, overall harms, treatment-related harms and mortality, although patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors experienced less infections (relative risk 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91). Conclusions: DPP-4 inhibitors were superior to placebo in reducing HbA1c levels in adults with T2DM taking at least two oral agents. Compared with placebo, no safety signals were detected with DPP-4 inhibitors and there was a reduced risk of infection. There was no significant difference in HbA1c observed between NPH and placebo or NPH and DPP-4 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据