4.6 Article

Strategies TO reduce time delays in patients with AcuTe coronary heart disease treated with primary PCI-the STOP WATCH study: a multistage action research project

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003493

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To identify, evaluate and reduce system delay times in an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEN) network by targeted reorganisation of logistics and personal feedback to staff on time delays. Design: Multistage action research project. Three study phases were used (exploration, tailored intervention and evaluation). Setting: Single centre study, Sweden. Patients: Consecutive patients (N=156) with prehospital STEN onset treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Interventions: Areas of delays were identified through participant observations and collaborative discussions. To increase the awareness of delay factors, continuous feedback on time delays was given. Elements of the logistics' reorganisation were (1) prioritised ECG recording by emergency medical services personnel, (2) central evaluation of ECG in all patients and (3) start of PCI procedure when two of three PCI team members were on site. Multiple key time measurements were made before (N=67) and after (N=89) the intervention. Main outcomes: Time difference (minutes) in system delay between the preintervention and postintervention phases. Results: Time from first medical contact (FMC) to a patent artery and time from FMC-to-catheter laboratory (cath-lab) arrival decreased by 6 and 12 min, respectively (ns). Time from FMC-to-ECG recording remained unchanged after the intervention. Time from ECG to decision for primary PCI was reduced by 6 min, p=0.004 and time from ECG-to-cath-lab arrival by 11 min, p=0.02. Total time from diagnosis to a patent artery decreased by 11 min (ns). Conclusions: Identification of time delays in an STEN network with awareness of delay factors, reorganisation of logistics and continuous feedback can reduce system delay times significantly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据