4.6 Article

(123I)FP-CIT SPECT in suspected dementia with Lewy bodies: a longitudinal case study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002642

关键词

-

资金

  1. GE Healthcare
  2. Western Norway regional health authority [Helse Vest 911714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Little is known regarding the false-negative' or false-positive' striatal dopamine transporter binding on SPECT for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We explored the clinical course in patients fulfilling the criteria for clinical DLB with a normal (I-123)FP-CIT SPECT (ie, SPECT scan negative, clinical features positive (S-CF+)) and patients not fulfilling DLB criteria with an abnormal scan (S+CF-). Design Longitudinal case study over 2-5years. Setting Consecutive referrals of patients with mild dementia to dementia clinics in western Norway. Participants 50 patients (27 men and 23 women; mean age at baseline of 74 (range 52-88)) with (I-123)FP-CIT SPECT images underwent cluster analysis: 20/50 patients allocated to a DLB' and 8 to a non-DLB' cluster were included. Outcome measures Scores on standardised clinical rating scales for hallucinations, parkinsonism, fluctuations, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder and visually rated (I-123)FP-CIT SPECT. Results During the follow-up period, in the S+CF- group (n=7), frequency and severity of DLB symptoms tended to increase, particularly parkinsonism (7/7) and cognitive fluctuations (7/7), while severity of visual hallucinations and REM sleep behaviour disorder remained stable. The S-CF+ (n=3) fulfilled the operationalised criteria for probable DLB both at baseline and at the end of the follow-up. Conclusions The findings suggest that systematic visual analyses of (I-123)FP-CIT SPECT can detect people with DLB prior to the development of the full clinical syndrome. In addition, the study indicates that some patients fulfilling clinical criteria for probable DLB have a normal scan, and further studies are required to characterise these patients better.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据