4.6 Article

Exposure to hot and cold temperatures and ambulance attendances in Brisbane, Australia: a time-series study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001074

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP1095752]
  2. NHMRC Research Fellowship [553043]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP1095752] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate the effect of hot and cold temperatures on ambulance attendances. Design: An ecological time-series study. Setting and participants: The study was conducted in Brisbane, Australia. The authors collected information on 783 935 daily ambulance attendances, along with data of associated meteorological variables and air pollutants, for the period of 2000-2007. Outcome measures: The total number of ambulance attendances was examined, along with those related to cardiovascular, respiratory and other non-traumatic conditions. Generalised additive models were used to assess the relationship between daily mean temperature and the number of ambulance attendances. Results: There were statistically significant relationships between mean temperature and ambulance attendances for all categories. Acute heat effects were found with a 1.17% (95% CI 0.86% to 1.48%) increase in total attendances for 1 degrees C increase above threshold (0-1 days lag). Cold effects were delayed and longer lasting with a 1.30% (0.87% to 1.73%) increase in total attendances for a 1 degrees C decrease below the threshold (2-15 days lag). Harvesting was observed following initial acute periods of heat effects but not for cold effects. Conclusions: This study shows that both hot and cold temperatures led to increases in ambulance attendances for different medical conditions. Our findings support the notion that ambulance attendance records are a valid and timely source of data for use in the development of local weather/health early warning systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据