4.5 Article

Validation of a portable nitric oxide analyzer for screening in primary ciliary dyskinesias

期刊

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-18

关键词

Nasal nitric oxide; Primary ciliary dyskinesia; Nitric oxide analyser

资金

  1. National Specialised Commissioning Team, NHS England
  2. Southampton NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility
  3. NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) levels are very low in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) and it is used as a screening test. Methods: We assessed the reliability and usability of a hand-held analyser in comparison to a stationary nitric oxide (NO) analyser in 50 participants (15 healthy, 13 PCD, 22 other respiratory diseases; age 6-79 years). Nasal NO was measured using a stationary NO analyser during a breath-holding maneuver, and using a hand-held analyser during tidal breathing, sampling at 2 ml/sec or 5 ml/sec. The three methods were compared for their specificity and sensitivity as a screen for PCD, their success rate in different age groups, within subject repeatability and acceptability. Correlation between methods was assessed. Results: Valid nNO measurements were obtained in 94% of participants using the stationary analyser, 96% using the hand-held analyser at 5 ml/sec and 76% at 2 ml/sec. The hand-held device at 5 ml/sec had excellent sensitivity and specificity as a screening test for PCD during tidal breathing (cut-off of 30 nL/min, 100% sensitivity, >95% specificity). The cut-off using the stationary analyser during breath-hold was 38 nL/min (100% sensitivity, 95% specificity). The stationary and hand-held analyser (5 ml/sec) showed reasonable within-subject repeatability(% coefficient of variation = 15). Conclusion: The hand-held NO analyser provides a promising screening tool for PCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据