3.9 Review

Improvement in vision: a new goal for treatment of hereditary retinal degenerations

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON ORPHAN DRUGS
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 563-575

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/21678707.2015.1030393

关键词

gene therapy; Leber congenital amaurosis; photoreceptors; retina; retinal pigment epithelium; retinoid cycle

资金

  1. National Eye Institute (National Institutes of Health) grants [U10 EY017280, EY06855, EY17549]
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  3. Hope for Vision
  4. Macula Vision Research Foundation
  5. Chatlos Foundation, Inc.
  6. University of Florida

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) have long been considered untreatable and incurable. Recently, one form of early-onset autosomal recessive IRD, Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) caused by mutations in RPE65 (retinal pigment epithelium-specific protein 65 kDa) gene, has responded with some improvement of vision to gene augmentation therapy and oral retinoid administration. This early success now requires refinement of such therapeutics to fully realize the impact of these major scientific and clinical advances. Areas covered: Progress toward human therapy for RPE65-LCA is detailed from the understanding of molecular mechanisms to preclinical proof-of-concept research to clinical trials. Unexpected positive and complicating results in the patients receiving treatment are explained. Logical next steps to advance the clinical value of the therapeutics are suggested. Expert opinion: The first molecularly based early-phase therapies for an IRD are remarkably successful in that vision has improved and adverse events are mainly associated with surgical delivery to the subretinal space. Yet, there are features of the gene augmentation therapeutic response, such as slowed kinetics of night vision, lack of foveal cone function improvement and relentlessly progressive retinal degeneration despite therapy, that still require research attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据