4.6 Article

Subjective Cognitive Impairment Cohort (SCIENCe): study design and first results

期刊

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0390-y

关键词

Subjective cognitive decline; Preclinical Alzheimer's disease; Subthreshold psychiatry; SCD-plus criteria; Study design

资金

  1. Gieskes-Strijbis Fonds
  2. JPND-EURO-SCD [JPND_PS_FP-689-019]
  3. Janssen-Stellar grant
  4. Alzheimer Assistance Foundation
  5. Center for Translational Molecular Imaging
  6. Alzheimer Association
  7. De Hersenstichting Nederland
  8. Alzheimer Nederland
  9. ZonMW
  10. Piramal Imaging and ZonMW-Memorabel (ABIDE) [70.73305-98-205]
  11. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Inc. (Philadelphia, PA, USA)
  12. Stichting VUmc fonds
  13. Stichting Dioraphte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We aimed to describe the Subjective Cognitive Impairment Cohort (SCIENCe) study design, to cross-sectionally describe participant characteristics, and to evaluate the SCD-plus criteria. Methods: The SCIENCe is a prospective cohort study of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) patients. Participants undergo extensive assessment, including cerebrospinal fluid collection and optional amyloid positron emission tomography scan, with annual follow-up. The primary outcome measure is clinical progression. Results: Cross-sectional evaluation of the first 151 participants (age 64 +/- 8, 44% female, Mini-Mental State Examination 29 +/- 2) showed that 28 (25%) had preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) (amyloid status available n = 114 (75%)), 58 (38%) had subthreshold psychiatry, and 65 (43%) had neither. More severe subjective complaints were associated with worse objective performance. The SCD-plus criteria age >= 60 (OR 7.7 (95% CI 1.7-38.9)) and apolipoprotein E (genotype) e4 (OR 4.8 (95% CI 1.6-15.0)) were associated with preclinical AD. Conclusions: The SCIENCe study confirms that SCD is a heterogeneous group, with preclinical AD and subthreshold psychiatric features. We found a number of SCD-plus criteria to be associated with preclinical AD. Further inclusion and follow-up will address important questions related to SCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据