4.6 Review

Active immunotherapy options for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/alzrt237

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Brain Power
  2. Karolinska Institutet Strategic Neuroscience Program
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and a major contributor to disability and dependency among older people. AD pathogenesis is associated with the accumulation of amyloid-beta protein (A beta) and/or hyperphosphorylated tau protein in the brain. At present, current therapies provide temporary symptomatic benefit, but do not treat the underlying disease. Recent research has thus focused on investigating the molecular and cellular pathways and processes involved in AD pathogenesis to support the development of effective disease-modifying agents. In accordance with the existing A beta-cascade hypothesis for AD pathogenesis, immunotherapy has been the most extensively studied approach in A beta-targeted therapy. Both passive and active immunotherapies have been shown to effectively reduce A beta accumulation and prevent downstream pathology in preclinical models. Following AN1792, second-generation active immunotherapies have shown promising results in terms of antibody response and safety. Comparatively, tau immunotherapy is not as advanced, but preclinical data support its development into clinical trials. Results from active amyloid-based immunotherapy studies in preclinical models indicate that intervention appears to be more effective in early stages of amyloid accumulation, highlighting the importance of diagnosing AD as early as possible and undertaking clinical trials at this stage. This strategy, combined with improving our understanding of the complex AD pathogenesis, is imperative to the successful development of these disease-modifying agents. This paper will review the active immunotherapies currently in development, including the benefits and challenges associated with this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据