4.6 Article

The association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/alzrt257

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alzheimer Nederland
  2. Stichting VUMC fonds
  3. Stichting Dioraphte
  4. 'Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek' (ISAO) [09502]
  5. Alzheimer Nederland [WE.15-2011-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Lower angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity could increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as ACE functions to degrade amyloid-beta (A beta). Therefore, we investigated whether ACE protein and activity levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum were associated with CSF A beta, total tau (tau) and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (ptau). Methods: We included 118 subjects from our memory clinic-based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (mean age 66 +/- 8 years) with subjective memory complaints (n = 40) or AD (n = 78), who did not use antihypertensive drugs. We measured ACE protein levels (ng/ml) and activity (RFU) in CSF and serum, and amyloid beta(1-42), tau and ptau (pg/ml) in CSF. Results: Cross-sectional regression analyses showed that ACE protein level and activity in CSF and serum were lower in patients with AD compared to controls. Lower CSF ACE protein level, and to a lesser extent serum ACE protein level and CSF ACE activity, were associated with lower CSF A beta, indicating more brain A beta pathology; adjusted regression coefficients (B) (95% CI) per SD increase were 0.09 (0.04; 0.15), 0.06 (0.00; 0.12) and 0.05 (0.00; 0.11), respectively. Further, lower CSF ACE protein level was associated with lower CSF tau and ptau levels; adjusted B's (95% CI) per SD increase were 0.15 (0.06; 0.25) and 0.17 (0.10; 0.25), respectively. Conclusions: These results strengthen the hypothesis that ACE degrades A beta. This could suggest that lowering ACE levels by for example ACE-inhibitors might have adverse consequences for patients with, or at risk for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据