4.4 Article

Analysis of metamaterial absorber in normal and oblique incidence by using interference theory

期刊

AIP ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4826522

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61371047]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110185110014]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [A03003023901006]
  4. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metamaterial absorber (MMA), which is a kind of thin electromagnetic absorber consisting of sub-wavelength metamaterial resonators and can exhibit near-perfect absorption characteristics, has been widely investigated in recently years. The impedance matching theory was proposed to analyze the configuration of MMA in most literatures. Such theory, however, may not suitable to analyze the interactions of metamaterial resonators and the ground plane. The interference theory, on another hand, can play effective approach for this kind of problem presented in recent studies, whereas little attention has been paid on the oblique incidence conditions. In this paper, we firstly extend the interference theory model to make it applicable for oblique incident waves and analyze MMA using the extended interference theory model. Secondly, we further explore the sufficient condition for the maximum absorptivity at both normal and oblique incidence cases. Thirdly, with the sufficient condition, we can obtain the absorbing frequency directly if the thickness of MMA is given. These theoretical results have significant effects on the design and analyze of MMA. And lastly, we point out that absorptivity is not absolutely insensitive to the incidence angle in TM mode as what previous study claims, but insensitive when the dielectric slab is high loss, which can also be explained by interference theory. (C) 2013 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据