4.7 Article

Photocrosslinkable Kappa-Carrageenan Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 6, 页码 895-907

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201200317

关键词

kappa-carrageenan; hydrogels; mechanical properties; polymeric materials; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/42968/2008]
  2. [MIT/ECE/0047/2009]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [MIT/ECE/0047/2009, SFRH/BD/42968/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kappa carrageenan (-CA) is a natural-origin polymer that closely mimics the glycosaminoglycan structure, one of the most important constituents of native tissues extracellular matrix. Previously, it has been shown that -CA can crosslink via ionic interactions rendering strong, but brittle hydrogels. In this study, we introduce photocrosslinkable methacrylate moieties on the -CA backbone to create physically and chemically crosslinked hydrogels highlighting their use in the context of tissue engineering. By varying the degree of methacrylation, the effect on hydrogel crosslinking was investigated in terms of hydration degree, dissolution profiles, morphological, mechanical, and rheological properties. Furthermore, the viability of fibroblast cells cultured inside the photocrosslinked hydrogels was investigated. The combination of chemical and physical crosslinking procedures enables the formation of hydrogels with highly versatile physical and chemical properties, while maintaining the viability of encapsulated cells. To our best knowledge, this is the first study reporting the synthesis of photocrosslinkable -CA with controllable compressive moduli, swelling ratios and pore size distributions. Moreover, by micromolding approaches, spatially controlled geometries and cell distribution patterns could be obtained, thus enabling the development of cell-material platforms that can be applied and tailored to a broad range of tissue engineering strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据