4.7 Article

Birth of a Photosynthetic Chassis: A MoClo Toolkit Enabling Synthetic Biology in the Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 2074-2086

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00251

关键词

algal biotechnology; Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; modular cloning; synthetic biology

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE05-0008]
  2. LABEX DYNAMO [ANR-LABX-011]
  3. DFG [TRR175, FOR2092]
  4. OpenPlant (BBSRC/EPSRC)
  5. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2015-68216-P, BIO2015-74432-JIN]
  6. VILLUM Foundation [13363]
  7. Technology Platforms at the Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec) Bielefeld University
  8. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  9. ERA-SynBio project Sun2Chem
  10. BBSRC [BB/M018180/1, BB/I007660/1, BB/I00680X/1, BB/L014130/1, BB/R021694/1, BB/M018210/1, BB/D011043/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microalgae are regarded as promising organisms to develop innovative concepts based on their photosynthetic capacity that offers more sustainable production than heterotrophic hosts. However, to realize their potential as green cell factories, a major challenge is to make microalgae easier to engineer. A promising approach for rapid and predictable genetic manipulation is to use standardized synthetic biology tools and workflows. To this end we have developed a Modular Cloning toolkit for the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. It is based on Golden Gate cloning with standard syntax, and comprises 119 openly distributed genetic parts, most of which have been functionally validated in several strains. It contains promoters, UTRs, terminators, tags, reporters, antibiotic resistance genes, and introns cloned in various positions to allow maximum modularity. The toolkit enables rapid building of engineered cells for both fundamental research and algal biotechnology. This work will make Chlamydomonas the next chassis for sustainable synthetic biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据