4.7 Article

Modular Extracellular Sensor Architecture for Engineering Mammalian Cell-based Devices

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 892-902

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sb400128g

关键词

mammalian synthetic biology; receptor engineering; biosensor; cell therapy

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [W911NF-11-2-0066]
  2. Northwestern University Flow Cytometry Facility
  3. Cancer Center Support Grant [NCI CA060553]
  4. National Academies Keck Futures Initiative [NAKFI-SB6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineering mammalian cell-based devices that monitor and therapeutically modulate human physiology is a promising and emerging frontier in clinical synthetic biology. However, realizing this vision will require new technologies enabling engineered circuitry to sense and respond to physiologically relevant cues. No existing technology enables an engineered cell to sense exclusively extracellular ligands, including proteins and pathogens, without relying upon native cellular receptors or signal transduction pathways that may be subject to crosstalk with native cellular components. To address this need, we here report a technology we term a Modular Extracellular Sensor Architecture (MESA). This self-contained receptor and signal transduction platform is maximally orthogonal to native cellular processes and comprises independent, tunable protein modules that enable performance optimization and straightforward engineering of novel MESA that recognize novel ligands. We demonstrate ligand-inducible activation of MESA signaling, optimization of receptor performance using design-based approaches, and generation of MESA biosensors that produce outputs in the form of either transcriptional regulation or transcription-independent reconstitution of enzymatic activity. This systematic, quantitative platform characterization provides a framework for engineering MESA to recognize novel ligands and for integrating these sensors into diverse mammalian synthetic biology applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据