4.5 Article

Intraventricular Craniopharyngiomas: Surgical Management and Outcome Analyses in 24 Cases

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 82, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.015

关键词

Attachment grade; Extent of resection; Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Pure intraventricular craniopharyngioma is a rare subtype of craniopharyngioma that attaches frequently to the hypothalamus. The main challenge in tumor removal is protection of hypothalamic structure. The aim of our study was to set up a feasible risk-evaluation approach to help the surgeons make an individual treatment plan. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively 24 patients with pure intraventricular craniopharyngioma who underwent surgical therapy. Third ventricular deformation and thalamic attachment of the tumor were assessed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative inspection. Correlations between the outcome, extent of removal, and different attachment grades were analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging grade had a significant correlation with functional outcome. Attachment grade was significantly correlated with endocrine, functional, and radiologic outcome. In the gross total removal (GTR) group, significantly more newly developed endocrinologic deficits were observed compared with patients who underwent subtotal removal (STR). All 6 GTR cases with the greatest attachment grade (grade 2) acquired newly developed endocrine insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Attachment and deformation grade evaluated based on our criteria are significantly correlated with postoperative outcome. GTR of tightly attached tumor is associated with worse endocrinologic, functional, and radiologic outcomes compared with STR. Hence, we suggest that individual surgical plans should be made according to the grade of tumor attachment and hypothalamic deformation. STR should used in tumors with a high grade to achieve a good long-term outcome and avoid severe postoperative sequelae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据