4.5 Article

Hemodynamic Changes in Arteriovenous Malformations After Radiosurgery: Transcranial Doppler Evaluation

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 316-321

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.061

关键词

Arteriovenous malformation; Gamma Knife surgery; Transcranial Doppler

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To monitor hemodynamic changes using transcranial Doppler (TCD) in patients with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS). METHODS: The study comprised 22 patients (17 men and 6 women, mean age 42 years, range 18-69 years) with an unruptured AVM fed by only the middle cerebral artery (MCA) or its branches. Serial TCD profiles from proximal MCAs were analyzed and correlated with treatment outcome. RESULTS: Baseline TCD measurements (presented as means +/- standard deviations) revealed significantly higher mean blood flow velocity (Vm) and lower mean pulsatility index (PI) in MCAs ipsilateral to AVMs than in contralateral MCAs (Vm 102 cm/s +/- 29 vs 66 cm/s +/- 16, P < 0.05; PI 0.63 +/- 0.10 vs 0.84 +/- 0.10, P < .05). No correlation was found between AVM volumes and hemodynamic indices. Vm values in ipsilateral MCAs were lower at 6 months (88 cm/s +/- 26) after GKS than at baseline (P < 0.05). At 2 years after GKS, a further decrease in mean Vm and an increase in mean PI were observed in ipsilateral MCAs, which then approximated the values of contralateral MCAs (Vm 71 cm/s +/- 30 vs 61 cm/s +/- 11, P = 0.16; PI 0.76 +/- 0.17 vs 0.83 +/- 0.14, P = 0.15). Cerebral angiography (CAG) at the same time revealed total obliteration of AVMs in 11 patients. Changes in Vm and PI values were found to be correlated with the completeness of obliteration. However, no correlation was found between baseline TCD measurements and level of obliteration. CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of hemodynamic indices measured by TCD was found to be correlated with AVM obliteration after GKS. However, significant hemodynamic improvements may develop after GKS before obvious obliteration by anatomic imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据