4.5 Article

The Use of a Three-Dimensional Novel Computer-Based Model for Analysis of the Endonasal Endoscopic Approach to the Midline Skull Base

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 106-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.033

关键词

Endoscopic endonasal approach; Neuroanatomy; Pituitary surgery; Skull base surgery; Suprasellar area; Surgical anatomy; Three-dimensional anatomy; Transsphenoidal surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To apply a three-dimensional geometric model to various endoscopic endonasal approaches to analyze the bony anatomy of this area, quantify preoperatively bone removal, and optimize surgical planning. METHODS: Investigators dissected 18 human cadaveric heads at the Laboratory of Surgical NeuroAnatomy (LSNA) of the University of Barcelona (Spain). Before and after each dissection, a computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to create a three-dimensional geometric model of the approach performed in the dissection room. The model protocol was designed as follows: (i) a preliminary exploration of each specimen using the preoperative CT scan, (ii) creation of a computer-generated three-dimensional virtual model of the approach, (iii) cadaveric anatomic dissection, and (iv) development of a CT-based model of the approach as a result of the superimposition of predissection and postdissection digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images of specimens. RESULTS: This method employing preliminary virtual exploration of each specimen, the creation of a three-dimensional virtual model of the approach, and the overlapping of the predissection and postdissection three-dimensional models was useful to define the exact boundaries of the endoscopic endonasal craniectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Aside from laboratory anatomic dissection itself, this model is very effective in providing a depiction of bony landmarks and visual feedback of the amount of bone removed, improving the design of the craniectomy in the endoscopic endonasal midline skull base approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据