4.4 Article

Apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for lung cancer: A marker phase I trial

期刊

THORACIC CANCER
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 500-508

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12117

关键词

APOC1; gene-expression profiling; inflammation-associated genes; lung cancer; RT-PCR

资金

  1. Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital [SKH-8302-97-DR-36]
  2. National Science Council of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan [NSC98-2314-B-038-023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundTumor cells continuously evolve over time in response to host pressures. However, explanations as to how tumor cells are influenced by the inflammatory tumor microenvironment over time are, to date, poorly defined. We hypothesized that prognostic biomarkers could be obtained by exploring the expression of inflammation-associated genes between early and late stage lung cancer tumor samples. MethodsCandidate inflammation-associated genes, apolipoprotein C-1 (APOC1), MMP1, KMO)1, CXCL5, CXCL)7, IL-1, IL-1, TNF- and IL-6 were verified by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Gene expression profiles and immunofluorescence staining of 30 lung cancer tissues were compared. ResultsExpressions of APOC1 and IL-6 mRNA on tumor tissues in late stage disease were significantly higher than in early stage lung cancer samples. Immunofluorescence staining of tumor samples showed that the expression of APOC1 gradually increased from early to late stage in lung cancer patients. The expression levels of IL-6 and APOC1 in tumor samples were positively correlated; however, no prognostic value of APOC1 can be identified in serum samples. ConclusionsWe found that the level of tumor APOC1 was highly expressed in late stage lung cancer. Further research is warranted to determine the molecular mechanisms underlying the cross talk of APOC1 and IL-6 in tumor progression. An expanded sample size marker phase II study may lead to the discovery of new lung cancer therapeutics targeting APOC1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据