4.8 Article

Folate Receptor-Targeting Gold Nanoclusters as Fluorescence Enzyme Mimetic Nanoprobes for Tumor Molecular Colocalization Diagnosis

期刊

THERANOSTICS
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 142-153

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/thno.7266

关键词

Gold Nanoclusters; Fluorescence; Enzyme Mimetic; Tumor Diagnosis; Molecular Colocalization

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2011CB933600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071249, 81171446, 81301272, 20905050]
  3. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nanomedicine, Guangdong Innovation Team of Low-cost Healthcare, and Shenzhen [CXB201005250029A, JC201104220242A, JCYJ20130401170306862, JC201005260247A, JC201005 270326A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoprobes with enzyme-like properties attracted a growing interest in early screening and diagnosis of cancer. To achieve high accuracy and specificity of tumor detection, the design and preparation of enzyme mimetic nanoprobes with high enzyme activity, tumor targeting and excellent luminescence property is highly desirable. Herein, we described a novel kind of fluorescence enzyme mimetic nanoprobe based on folate receptor-targeting Au nanoclusters. The nanoprobes exhibited excellent stability, low cytotoxicity, high fluorescence and enzyme activity. We demonstrated that the nanoprobes could be used for tumor tissues fluorescence/visualizing detection. For the same tumor tissue slice, the nanoprobes peroxidase staining and fluorescent staining were obtained simultaneously, and the results were mutually complementary. Therefore, the fluorescence enzyme mimetic nanoprobes could provide a molecular colocalization diagnosis strategy, efficiently avoid false-positive and false-negative results, and further improve the accuracy and specificity of cancer diagnoses. By examining different clinical samples, we demonstrated that the nanoprobes could distinguish efficiently cancerous cells from normal cells, and exhibit a clinical potential for cancer diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据