4.5 Article

Sperm whale echolocation behaviour reveals a directed, prior-based search strategy informed by prey distribution

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 663-674

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1877-1

关键词

Spermwhales; Echolocation behaviour; Directed search behaviour; Prior information; Multi-target acoustic scene

资金

  1. Carlsberg Foundation
  2. ONR grant
  3. SERDP grant
  4. FNU grant
  5. Royal Society Fellowship
  6. International Campus of Excellence of the Canary Islands
  7. Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland
  8. project CETOBAPH [CGL2009-1311218]
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [smru10001] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predators make foraging decisions based upon sensory information about resource availability, but little is known about how large, air-breathing predators collect and use such information to maximize energy returns when foraging in the deep sea. Here, we used archival tags to study how echolocating sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) use their long-range sensory capabilities to guide foraging in a deep-water habitat consisting of multiple, depth-segregated prey layers. Sperm whales employ a directed search behaviour by modulating their overall sonar sampling with the intention to exploit a particular prey layer. They forage opportunistically during some descents while actively adjusting their acoustic gaze to sequentially track different prey layers. While foraging within patches, sperm whales adjust their clicking rate both to search new water volumes as they turn and to match the prey distribution. This strategy increases information flow and suggests that sperm whales can perform auditory stream segregation of multiple targets when echolocating. Such flexibility in sampling tactics in concert with long-range sensing capabilities apparently allow sperm whales to efficiently locate and access prey resources in vast, heterogeneous, deep water habitats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据