4.7 Review

Hormones, context, and Brain Gender: A review of evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 1738-1744

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.026

关键词

Embodiment; Intersex; Brain organization; Medical trauma; Masculinization; Review; Sexuality; Agnotology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain organization theory suggests that steroid hormones during fetal development permanently organize the brain for gender, including patterns of sexuality, cognition, temperament, and interests that differ by sex. This widely-accepted theory has important implications for health, ranging from medical management of infants with intersex conditions to suggested etiologies for sex differences in autism, depression, and other mental health problems. Studies of genetic females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), in which high prenatal androgens have been linked to both atypical genitals and masculine patterns of gender and sexuality, are particularly important. Based on a comprehensive review of research on CAH, this article demonstrates that such studies have neglected four broad categories of variables that plausibly affect psychosexual development: 1) physiological effects of CAH, including complex disruption of steroid hormones from early development onwards; 2) intensive medical intervention and surveillance, which many women with CAH describe as traumatic; 3) direct effects of genital morphology on sexuality (versus indirect effects that masculine genitals may have on gender socialization); and 4) expectations of masculinization that likely affect both the development and evaluation of gender and sexuality in CAH. Complex and iterative interactions among postnatal biological variables, medical interventions, and social context provide a more plausible explanation for atypicalities in psychology and behavior that have been reported for genetic females with CAH than the conventional explanation that early androgens have masculinized their brains. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据