4.7 Article

Place effects for areas defined by administrative boundaries: A life course analysis of mortality and cause specific morbidity in Scania, Sweden

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 73, 期 8, 页码 1145-1151

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.005

关键词

Contextual effects; Life course; Cross-classified multilevel logistic regression; Intra-class correlation; Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To understand the origin of disease risk in adulthood, factors in all stages of life and on different contextual levels should be considered. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of a person's area of residence over their life course with regard to four outcomes: all-cause mortality; ischemic heart disease mortality and morbidity; cancer mortality and morbidity; and respiratory diseases and related mortality. We applied a cross-classified multilevel model for three age groups on a longitudinal data set spanning a 35 year period in Scania, Sweden. According to our analyses, the proportion of the total variance at the district level for all the outcomes studied was below 2% for the 65 to 84 age group, below 4.5% for those ages 50-64 years, and below 6.5% for those 30-49 years old. Our results suggest that the parish of residence, at four different time points during the individual life course, had little influence on individual all-cause mortality, or on mortality or morbidity from IHD, cancer, and respiratory diseases; i.e., knowing when and where an individual resided during their life course gives little indication of future mortality and morbidity. Such knowledge is essential in assisting decision makers determine the relevant geographical level of intervention (in our case whether to direct interventions toward the entire region of Scania or to specific parishes) needed. Valuable information for planning public health interventions might be obtained by considering measures of variance and clustering from specific contexts before implementing strategic programs. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据