4.7 Article

Recent changes in the geography of social disparities in premature mortality in Quebec

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 67, 期 8, 页码 1269-1281

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.010

关键词

Geography; Social disparities; Deprivation; Premature mortality; Time trends; Quebec; Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most recent research reveals that social inequalities in premature mortality are widening. Such findings mainly apply to countries as a whole. In this study, we model recent changes in the association between premature mortality and a deprivation index (a small area-based index) in four geographic settings in Quebec, namely the Montreal metropolitan area, other Quebec metropolitan areas, mid-size cities, and small towns and rural areas. Deaths from all-cause and specific causes of mortality among people under age 75 are considered for the periods 1989-1993 and 1999-2003. Mortality rates are modeled using negative binomial regressions. Models are fitted for the overall population and for men and women, separately, in every geographic setting. Three measures of inequalities are used: mortality rates for different population groups, rate ratios and rate differences. Results show that social inequalities in premature mortality increase everywhere in Quebec except in the Montreal metropolitan area. Presently, the highest mortality rates among deprived groups are found in mid-size cities, small towns and rural areas; the highest rate ratios in the Montreal metropolitan area and other metropolitan areas of Quebec; and the highest rate differences in the Montreal metropolitan area, other metropolitan areas of Quebec and mid-size cities. These results are discussed with reference to possible explanatory factors, namely relative deprivation, smoking, immigration and internal migration. Indications on future research and policy implications are provided. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据