4.7 Article

Regenerative potential of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from patients undergoing haemodialysis in kidney regeneration

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33256-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [17ek0310006h0002]
  2. Kidney Foundation, Japan [JKFB15-1]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS-KAKENHI) [16H03175]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H03175] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kidney regeneration from pluripotent stem cells is receiving a lot of attention because limited treatments are currently available for chronic kidney disease (CKD). It has been shown that uremic state in CKD is toxic to somatic stem/progenitor cells, such as endothelial progenitor and mesenchyma I stem cells, affecting their differentiation and angiogenic potential. Recent studies reported that specific abnormalities caused by the non-inherited disease are often retained in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived products obtained from patients. Thus, it is indispensable to first assess whether iPSCs derived from patients with CKD due to non-inherited disease (CKD-iPSCs) have the ability to generate kidneys. In this study, we generated iPSCs from patients undergoing haemodialysis due to diabetes nephropathy and glomerulonephritis (HD-iPSCs) as representatives of CKD-iPSCs or from healthy controls (HC-iPSCs). HD-iPSCs differentiated into nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) with similar efficiency to HC-iPSCs. Additionally, HD-iPSC-derived NPCs expressed comparable levels of NPC markers and differentiated into vascularised glomeruli upon transplantation into mice, as HC-iPSC-derived NPCs. Our results indicate the potential of HD-iPSCs as a feasible cell source for kidney regeneration. This is the first study paving the way for CKD patient-stem cell-derived kidney regeneration, emphasising the potential of CKD-iPSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据